In addition to placing permanent military infrastructure in Syria—in the form both of its own Revolutionary Guard and of Hizballah and other Shiite militias—Tehran also seeks to establish its permanent influence by purchasing land, engineering demographic change, and taking control of religious institutions. Hanin Ghaddar and Dana Stroul argue that Washington can counteract these efforts without troops:

Over the past year, Sunni communities have been pushed out of their long-time homes [in the vicinity of Damascus] and replaced by people friendly to Iran and the Assad regime. . . . According to reports quoting Syrian officials, more than 8,000 properties in the Damascus area have been transferred to foreign Shiite owners in the past three years. Iran is also transforming local Sunni mosques into Shiite religious centers and shrines, as well as constructing new Shiite meeting halls, mosques, and schools. . . .

Another development that indicates Iran’s goal of establishing a multi-generational presence in Syria is the Assad regime’s decision to open Farsi-language departments in several educational institutions, including Damascus University, Baath University in Homs, and Tishreen University in Latakia. The courses offered by these departments come with a wide array of incentives to boost the number of Syrians they reach. . .

In August 2017, Washington froze more than $200 million in U.S. stabilization assistance for communities liberated from Islamic State. Although Saudi Arabia and other countries have pledged to fill the funding gap, restarting U.S. assistance would give Syrian communities an immediate alternative to Iranian patronage, particularly with regard to civilian protection, job creation, education, and basic services. Even without U.S. forces on hand, the State Department and U.S. Agency for International Development have developed robust programs for providing and monitoring aid in hard-to-reach places. These programs should be expanded to more meaningful levels. . . .

Recently, several regional governments have reached out to Syria, [having concluded] that the Assad regime is here to stay given Russia and Iran’s unconditional support. . . . Yet such rapprochement should not be given away for free. The [Trump] administration should press these governments to insist on specific conditions before reopening their embassies, such as the reversal of Law Number 10, [which has dispossessed Sunnis and enabled Iranian demographic engineering], and the closing of Iran-sponsored religious institutions.

Two extraordinary events demonstrate something important about Israel’s most fervent adversaries. One was a speech given at something called The People’s Forum (funded generously by Goldman Sachs), which stated, “When the state of Israel is finally destroyed and erased from history, that will be the single most important blow we can give to destroying capitalism and imperialism.”

The suggestion that this tiny state is the linchpin of a global, centuries-old phenomenon like capitalism goes well beyond anything resembling rational criticism. Even if Israel were guilty of genocide, apartheid, and oppression—which of course it is not—it would not follow that its destruction would help end capitalism or imperialism.

The other was an anti-Israel protest that took place in front of New York City’s Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, deemed “complicit” in Israel’s evils. At organizers’ urging, participants shouted their slogans at kids in the cancer ward, who were watching from the windows. Given Hamas’s indifference toward the lives of Gazan children, such callousness toward non-Palestinian children from Hamas’s Western allies shouldn’t be surprising. The protest—like the abovementioned speech—deliberately conveyed the message that Israel is the ultimate evil and its destruction the ultimate good, cancer patients be damned.

The fact that Israel’s adversaries are almost comically perverse does not mean that they can be dismissed. If its allies fail to understand the obsessive and irrational hatred that it faces, they cannot effectively help it defend itself.