Development Site - Changes here will not affect the live (production) site.

The New Iraqi Prime Minister Wants to Loosen Iran’s Grip on His Country

July 24 2020

Shortly after the fall of Saddam Hussein to American-led forces, Tehran began expanding its influence into Iraq and carrying out attacks on U.S. forces there. The war against Islamic State a decade later allowed the mullahs to create the “popular mobilization forces” (PMF)—a network of Iraqi Shiite militias operating in tandem with, but independently from, the Iraqi military—which of late have been firing rockets at American bases. By simultaneously cultivating influence in the Iraqi government, Iran has managed to make the country part of its “land bridge” connecting it, via Syria and Lebanon, to the Mediterranean and to Israel’s borders. Yaron Schneider explores the possibility that Baghdad’s new prime minister, Mustafa al-Kadhimi, will bring change:

[F]ollowing [Khadhimi’s] taking office, several senior officials believed to be responsible for the violent suppression of the mass demonstrations that began in October 2019—in response to Iraq’s deteriorating economic situation and in protest against government corruption and Iranian penetration of the country—were replaced. In recent days, the Iraqi media have reported the dismissal of Falah al-Fayyad, the head of the Iraq National Security Council, who was also the director of the PMF, and was known for his close ties to the Iranian regime.

In late June, in an operation widely covered by the media, several operatives of Kata’ib Hizballah [the foremost pro-Iranian militia], were arrested by Iraqi anti-terrorism forces, apparently in the wake of intelligence information received from the Americans about the preparation of rocket barrages aimed at the embassy compound. But most of those arrested were released after a few days.

It is too early to say whether Kadhimi and the security agencies under his command are planning a confrontation with the pro-Iranian militias, which is liable to escalate because of both side’s determination to establish facts on the ground. It is likely that so far as the Iraqi prime minister in concerned, this is not a zero-sum game; it is mainly an attempt to set red lines for the militias and to allow them to continue operating under the government’s restrictions.

Kadhimi’s success in reining in the activity of the Shiite militias and the results of the dialogue between Iraq and the United States [about these efforts] will have a direct effect on Israel’s interests, especially Baghdad agrees to commit to increasing its control over its borders and thwarting cross-border terrorist activity.

Read more at Institute for National Security Studies

More about: Iran, Iraq, Israeli Security, U.S. Foreign policy

The Summary: 10/7/20

Two extraordinary events demonstrate something important about Israel’s most fervent adversaries. One was a speech given at something called The People’s Forum (funded generously by Goldman Sachs), which stated, “When the state of Israel is finally destroyed and erased from history, that will be the single most important blow we can give to destroying capitalism and imperialism.”

The suggestion that this tiny state is the linchpin of a global, centuries-old phenomenon like capitalism goes well beyond anything resembling rational criticism. Even if Israel were guilty of genocide, apartheid, and oppression—which of course it is not—it would not follow that its destruction would help end capitalism or imperialism.

The other was an anti-Israel protest that took place in front of New York City’s Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, deemed “complicit” in Israel’s evils. At organizers’ urging, participants shouted their slogans at kids in the cancer ward, who were watching from the windows. Given Hamas’s indifference toward the lives of Gazan children, such callousness toward non-Palestinian children from Hamas’s Western allies shouldn’t be surprising. The protest—like the abovementioned speech—deliberately conveyed the message that Israel is the ultimate evil and its destruction the ultimate good, cancer patients be damned.

The fact that Israel’s adversaries are almost comically perverse does not mean that they can be dismissed. If its allies fail to understand the obsessive and irrational hatred that it faces, they cannot effectively help it defend itself.

Read more at Mosaic