Since the 1990s, the Jewish state has done much to break free from the economic fetters of its socialist past, leading to unprecedented growth and prosperity. But many restraints remain, as Sue Surkes explains:

Few [Israelis] know that when they clean the kitchen, the price of their Palmolive liquid soap and Ajax window spray is set countrywide by a single . . . importer and distributor, who also provides them with their Colgate and Elmex toothpaste, Revlon, and Neutrogena beauty products, Speed Stick deodorant, Band-Aid bandages, and more. All of these brands are exclusively franchised to a company few have heard of, called Schestowitz, [which, together with a corporation called] Diplomat, has exclusive rights both to import and to distribute a staggering array of name-brand products that can be found in most Israeli homes.

This kind of centralized control can be found throughout the Israeli economy. It stifles competition, ensures that prices remain high, and helps to explain why the Jewish state was ranked earlier this month as having the eighth-highest cost of living in the world. Nine years after massive social protests against that cost of living, Israel still has more monopolies than the U.S. or any European country.

After mass demonstrations in 2011 that brought hundreds of thousands of Israelis onto the streets countrywide—it was estimated at the time that the ten biggest business groups controlled 41 percent of the market value of public companies—the Knesset passed the Law for Promotion of Competition and Reduction of Concentration in 2013. . . . While there is a little less concentration than there was before 2013, the Israeli economy [nevertheless remains] highly concentrated.

Worse still, a proposed new tax law could make things worse:

The Finance Ministry’s chief economist, Shira Greenberg, has been talking over recent months about [applying] the 17-percent value-added tax (VAT) on all items ordered from overseas online retailers, such as Amazon, . . . to help raise cash to pay off the country’s deficit. To date, purchases totaling less than $75 have been VAT-exempt, offering Israelis a way to sidestep inflated prices at home and bringing pressure to bear on Israeli retailers to lower their prices, too.

Two extraordinary events demonstrate something important about Israel’s most fervent adversaries. One was a speech given at something called The People’s Forum (funded generously by Goldman Sachs), which stated, “When the state of Israel is finally destroyed and erased from history, that will be the single most important blow we can give to destroying capitalism and imperialism.”

The suggestion that this tiny state is the linchpin of a global, centuries-old phenomenon like capitalism goes well beyond anything resembling rational criticism. Even if Israel were guilty of genocide, apartheid, and oppression—which of course it is not—it would not follow that its destruction would help end capitalism or imperialism.

The other was an anti-Israel protest that took place in front of New York City’s Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, deemed “complicit” in Israel’s evils. At organizers’ urging, participants shouted their slogans at kids in the cancer ward, who were watching from the windows. Given Hamas’s indifference toward the lives of Gazan children, such callousness toward non-Palestinian children from Hamas’s Western allies shouldn’t be surprising. The protest—like the abovementioned speech—deliberately conveyed the message that Israel is the ultimate evil and its destruction the ultimate good, cancer patients be damned.

The fact that Israel’s adversaries are almost comically perverse does not mean that they can be dismissed. If its allies fail to understand the obsessive and irrational hatred that it faces, they cannot effectively help it defend itself.