For some weeks, optimistic rumors have circulated that the Gaza-based terrorist organization Hamas was poised to issue a new charter, and a draft was even leaked to the Arabic-language press. On Monday, Hamas’s outgoing leader, Khaled Meshal, officially released the document, which, because it emphasizes war with “Zionists” and the “Israeli entity” rather than with all Jews as such, has been taken in some quarters as a sign of moderation. Kate Havard and Grant Rumley explain why it is not:

Contrary to reports, this new document neither replaces the [existing] charter nor abrogates [it]. While it is a departure from the faction’s 1988 manifesto, it is not a sign of moderation. Rather, it is an effort to ease international isolation and appeal to the rival Fatah party’s base of support.

Most notable in the new document is what is not included: any reference to the Muslim Brotherhood, [of which] Hamas is an offshoot. While that was viewed as a benefit during the 2011 Arab Spring, it is now decidedly a vulnerability. With the rise of Abdel Fattah el-Sisi in Egypt, the Brotherhood and all of its offshoots—including Hamas—have been subject to a merciless campaign designed to weaken the movement. . . . Hamas is hoping its new document softens Sisi’s [attitude toward it]. Hamas is also eager to win favor with other Arab states, such as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Both have soured on Hamas’s politics, thanks in part to the group’s ongoing ties to Iran. This was almost certainly also part of the Hamas calculus.

Observers yesterday were quick to point out that Hamas acknowledged the 1967 borders. . . . Yet . . . the document defines Hamas’s goal as controlling the land “from the River Jordan in the east to the Mediterranean in the west.” Observers have also noted that the new Hamas document omits calls for “obliteration” of Israel, but, in fact, it merely replaces that with a total rejection of the “Zionist entity.” The document calls for “all forms of resistance”—a euphemism for terrorism in Hamas parlance.

Two extraordinary events demonstrate something important about Israel’s most fervent adversaries. One was a speech given at something called The People’s Forum (funded generously by Goldman Sachs), which stated, “When the state of Israel is finally destroyed and erased from history, that will be the single most important blow we can give to destroying capitalism and imperialism.”

The suggestion that this tiny state is the linchpin of a global, centuries-old phenomenon like capitalism goes well beyond anything resembling rational criticism. Even if Israel were guilty of genocide, apartheid, and oppression—which of course it is not—it would not follow that its destruction would help end capitalism or imperialism.

The other was an anti-Israel protest that took place in front of New York City’s Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, deemed “complicit” in Israel’s evils. At organizers’ urging, participants shouted their slogans at kids in the cancer ward, who were watching from the windows. Given Hamas’s indifference toward the lives of Gazan children, such callousness toward non-Palestinian children from Hamas’s Western allies shouldn’t be surprising. The protest—like the abovementioned speech—deliberately conveyed the message that Israel is the ultimate evil and its destruction the ultimate good, cancer patients be damned.

The fact that Israel’s adversaries are almost comically perverse does not mean that they can be dismissed. If its allies fail to understand the obsessive and irrational hatred that it faces, they cannot effectively help it defend itself.