Yesterday the Israeli government announced the appointment of a new ambassador to Turkey, one of the final steps in implementing the reconciliation agreement the two countries reached in June. Yet whether Jerusalem and Ankara will be able to maintain their resurrected alliance depends on the latter’s involvement in the intricacies of internal Palestinian politics, which are themselves connected to the equally intricate web of Middle Eastern rivalries. Pinhas Inbari writes:

The [attempt to overthrow President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in July] shed new light on Turkish-Palestinian relations. Fatah and Hamas expressed common support for Erdogan, while Palestinian leftist organizations linked to the Assad regime did not. The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, which favor Iran [and its Syrian ally], issued statements criticizing the Israeli-Turkish agreement, [as did] Fatah’s representative in Lebanon. . . .

Although Turkey and Iran are the two regional powers with the greatest influence on Hamas, instead of coordinating their influence, they fight over it. The struggle between Turkey and Iran has also divided Hamas between Turkey-supporters and Iran-supporters, with the pro-Turkish leadership linked to the West Bank and the pro-Iranian leadership situated in Gaza and Lebanon. . . .

The Hamas official most identified with Turkey is [the current politburo chief] Khaled Mashal. . . . Turkey’s support for Mashal has come to the fore in the initiation and planning of West Bank terror attacks. Mashal’s right-hand man Saleh al-Aruri . . . has been the guiding hand of the attacks. . . . Israel insisted that Turkey close the Hamas offices in its borders and expel Aruri and his associates. It is not clear whether this has really happened. New reports suggest that the office still exists. . . .

The real difficulty likely to arise between Turkey and Israel, however, concerns east Jerusalem and the Temple Mount. Turkey has ties with the most extreme elements, such as the former mufti Akrama Sabri, inciter Raed Salah, and Hamas. If it decides to protect them against Israel [in order] to assume leadership of the “al-Aqsa is in danger” campaign, thereby promoting its status as a regional Islamic power, Israel will find itself facing a problem.

Thus, the future of Israeli-Turkish relations depends on the question: will the reconciliation with Israel, along with the lessons of the failed rebellion against him, lead Erdogan to be less “Islamic” and more “Turkish?” In other words, will he prefer Turkey’s interests as a state to those of the Muslim Brotherhood?

Two extraordinary events demonstrate something important about Israel’s most fervent adversaries. One was a speech given at something called The People’s Forum (funded generously by Goldman Sachs), which stated, “When the state of Israel is finally destroyed and erased from history, that will be the single most important blow we can give to destroying capitalism and imperialism.”

The suggestion that this tiny state is the linchpin of a global, centuries-old phenomenon like capitalism goes well beyond anything resembling rational criticism. Even if Israel were guilty of genocide, apartheid, and oppression—which of course it is not—it would not follow that its destruction would help end capitalism or imperialism.

The other was an anti-Israel protest that took place in front of New York City’s Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, deemed “complicit” in Israel’s evils. At organizers’ urging, participants shouted their slogans at kids in the cancer ward, who were watching from the windows. Given Hamas’s indifference toward the lives of Gazan children, such callousness toward non-Palestinian children from Hamas’s Western allies shouldn’t be surprising. The protest—like the abovementioned speech—deliberately conveyed the message that Israel is the ultimate evil and its destruction the ultimate good, cancer patients be damned.

The fact that Israel’s adversaries are almost comically perverse does not mean that they can be dismissed. If its allies fail to understand the obsessive and irrational hatred that it faces, they cannot effectively help it defend itself.