“Administrative absolutism” has its eyes set on religious liberty.

Contemporary debates forget that it serves a distinct social and moral purpose.

Last week, the Supreme Court heard the case of Ari Zivotofsky, a boy born in Jerusalem whose parents want his country of birth to be. . .

America’s constitutional tradition of religious neutrality is intended not to bar religion from influencing the state but to prevent the state from corrupting religion.

In complaining about Americans’ legalistic approach to governance, the Economist exposes its own failure to grasp the canonical status of the country’s founding charters.