Development Site - Changes here will not affect the live (production) site.

Bin Laden’s Prescient View of Islamic State’s Weaknesses

Nov. 22 2017

Al-Qaeda’s Iraqi branch renamed itself Islamic State in Iraq (ISI) and began distancing itself from its parent organization in 2006. It severed ties completely in 2014, when it declared a caliphate, violating orders from Osama bin Laden and his successors. Thanks to the CIA’s release of the trove of captured documents from bin Laden’s Pakistan redoubt, the relationship between the two terrorist groups, and bin Laden’s insights into the rival group’s vulnerabilities, have become clearer. Thomas Joscelyn writes:

[A]n initial review of the Abbottabad files suggests that bin Laden still considered the ISI to be part of his network at the time of his death. Regardless, bin Laden never would have approved of Islamic State’s caliphate declaration in 2014. . . .

“We need to fight in areas where we can gain points toward the creation of the caliphate-based state,” [wrote bin Laden and a deputy]. Yet “the enemy” could “easily destroy” any state lacking the “essential foundations to function and defend itself.” Although al-Qaeda viewed the United States as a weakened foe, the world’s only superpower was still strong enough to topple quickly both Saddam’s regime and the Taliban’s Islamic emirate. Bin Laden . . . warned that a newly declared caliphate would meet the same fate. . . . Bin Laden made a commonsense observation that resonates across many contexts: the “public does not like losers.” . . .

Despite its territorial setbacks, it is too early to pronounce total victory over Islamic State. As U.S. intelligence officials warned earlier this year, the organization likely retains enough personnel and resources to continue waging guerrilla warfare. And Islamic State’s fortunes are no longer confined to Iraq and Syria. Its enterprise is global, with representatives everywhere from West Africa to Southeast Asia. Its network in the West will also continue to bedevil European and American counterterrorism officials.

Still, bin Laden warned that the jihadists would not be able to hold onto their territory if they declared a caliphate. He was right. Al-Qaeda’s branches in Africa and the Middle East face their own hurdles, but they continue to follow his more patient approach. Time will tell if bin Laden’s longer-term plan for caliphate-building will bear fruit.

Read more at Weekly Standard

More about: Al Qaeda, ISIS, Osama bin Laden, Politics & Current Affairs, War on Terror

 

The Summary: 10/7/20

Two extraordinary events demonstrate something important about Israel’s most fervent adversaries. One was a speech given at something called The People’s Forum (funded generously by Goldman Sachs), which stated, “When the state of Israel is finally destroyed and erased from history, that will be the single most important blow we can give to destroying capitalism and imperialism.”

The suggestion that this tiny state is the linchpin of a global, centuries-old phenomenon like capitalism goes well beyond anything resembling rational criticism. Even if Israel were guilty of genocide, apartheid, and oppression—which of course it is not—it would not follow that its destruction would help end capitalism or imperialism.

The other was an anti-Israel protest that took place in front of New York City’s Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, deemed “complicit” in Israel’s evils. At organizers’ urging, participants shouted their slogans at kids in the cancer ward, who were watching from the windows. Given Hamas’s indifference toward the lives of Gazan children, such callousness toward non-Palestinian children from Hamas’s Western allies shouldn’t be surprising. The protest—like the abovementioned speech—deliberately conveyed the message that Israel is the ultimate evil and its destruction the ultimate good, cancer patients be damned.

The fact that Israel’s adversaries are almost comically perverse does not mean that they can be dismissed. If its allies fail to understand the obsessive and irrational hatred that it faces, they cannot effectively help it defend itself.

Read more at Mosaic