Development Site - Changes here will not affect the live (production) site.

Ukraine Finally Comes to Terms with Babi Yar

When the late poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko visited the notorious ravine near Kiev in 1961, he was shocked to find no monument to the 34,000 Jews who were murdered there in September 1941. The absence of any sign of commemoration—which gave Yevtushenko’s poem “Babi Yar” its opening line—was not the result of neglect but of a deliberate Soviet policy of covering up the Holocaust and suppressing any recognition that the Nazis specifically targeted Jews. After gaining independence, Ukraine did little to alter Soviet policies toward Holocaust commemoration, but now, writes Norman Naimark, change is finally coming:

In September 1991, the 40th anniversary of Babi Yar and the eve of the fall of the Soviet Union, Ukrainian authorities unveiled a large and distinctively Jewish menorah memorial at the ravine. . . . But attempts over the following decade to mark the site as one of special meaning to Jews were frustrated by the building of a number of memorials at different spots all over the area (there are some 30 at various places around the territory now), recalling the diverse victims who were killed along with the Jews in the ravine. . . . Meanwhile, Babi Yar still had playgrounds, a park, a television tower, and even some apartments on its territory. . . .

President Petro Poroshenko changed all of this as part of his intention, inspired in part by the Maidan demonstrations in the winter of 2014–15, to integrate Ukraine into European institutions. . . . Poroshenko’s decree of August 12, 2015, “Concerning Measures in Connection with the 75th Anniversary of the Babi Yar Tragedy,” for the first time, acknowledged at the state level the importance of Babi Yar as a crucial place of memory in the history of the Holocaust. . . .

Poroshenko’s decree was followed by an extremely important speech [by him] in Israel’s Knesset on December 23, 2015, which emphasized the importance of Babi Yar to the Holocaust, talked about the death of 1.5-million Ukrainian Jews, murdered simply because they were Jews, and spoke of the shared grief of Jews and Ukrainians for those lost in the war. Poroshenko also pointed to the Ukrainian “Righteous Gentiles” who had risked their lives to save Jews and were recognized formally by the Israeli state for their actions. He also proved willing to talk about Ukrainian collaborators in the Holocaust, who, he stated, “unfortunately, existed practically in all European countries that were occupied by the Nazis, and helped those monsters to implement the ‘final solution to the Jewish question.’” At the same time, he apologized to the children and grandchildren of Ukrainian Holocaust victims on behalf of the Ukrainian nation.

You have 1 free article left this month

Sign up now for unlimited access

Subscribe Now

Already a subscriber? Sign in now

Read more at Hoover

More about: History & Ideas, Holocaust, Soviet Jewry, Soviet Union, Ukraine

Germany’s Bid to Keep Israel off the UN Security Council

March 21 2018

The Jewish state has never held a temporary seat on the United Nations Security Council. For the first 50 years of its existence, it was denied membership in any of the UN’s regional groups, which control candidacies for these rotating seats. Then it was finally admitted to the Western European and Others Group, which promptly agreed to wait another twenty years before approving Jerusalem for a Security Council candidacy. Now, Benny Avni notes, Germany is poised to block action:

As a good-faith gesture, the Western European and Others Group promised Israel that it and Belgium would run uncontested for the two open 2019-20 [Security Council] seats. Then, in 2016, Germany announced it would also run—even though it already served as a council member [multiple times, including] as recently as 2011-12. . . . [U]nless Belgium yields, Israel’s hopes for UN respect seem doomed for now—and maybe for the foreseeable future.

Why? Diplomats have been telling me Israel violates too many Security Council resolutions to be a member—as in the one passed during the last weeks of Barack Obama’s presidency, which marked Jewish holy sites as occupied Palestinian territory. But is building a porch in [the West Bank town of] Ma’ale Adumim really such a huge threat to world peace?

How about, then, a report released last week by UN experts on the Security Council’s North Korea sanctions? It found Germany violated a council ban on sparkling wines, exporting $151,840 worth of bubbly and other luxury goods to Kim Jong Un’s cronies. Or how about, as the Jerusalem Post’s Benjamin Weinthal reports, German companies exporting to Iran banned materials that were later used in chemical attacks in Syria?

Never mind. Germany (and Belgium) will surely benefit from the UN’s habit of magnifying Israel’s violations beyond all proportion. Thus, Israel’s petition to join the most prestigious UN club will likely be rejected, thanks to a late entry by a shameless [and] cynical German power play against the Jewish state.

You've just used your last free article this month

Sign up now for unlimited access

Subscribe Now

Already a subscriber? Sign in now

Read more at New York Post

More about: Germany, Israel & Zionism, Israeli-German relations, United Nations